
I'm beginning to regret the title of this column. It forces me to constantly try to find angles that relate my antics to the state of Canadian gaming in general, which isn't really that different from American gaming, except for the presence of French on everything (which is less of a difference these days), the lack of availability of certain items, and the presence of crappy game companies within our country. Ubisoft apparently has the ability to do a good job on games that they care about, but when it comes to translating games from other companies, they do kinda drop the ball sometimes. Lunar: Dragon Song was apparently the first traditional RPG on the DS. Ubisoft didn't have to rush their translation, considering that I'm pretty sure the next RPG on the DS was also translated by Ubisoft. Who were they racing? Themselves?
Next week I'll be giving this column a new name.
Twittering a gaming journal does have its downside. If I'm playing my game and I'm not near a computer, I had better hope that I don't come up with something that I want to post, since I don't have a cell phone, and apparently my PSP doesn't like the site.
But anyway, this week I can't help but notice just how badly certain survey companies handle gaming questions. There was one survey I took recently where they asked about games I'd heard of, then asked about games I'd personally owned copies of. The games they listed? "Zelda". No individual titles, just "Zelda". "Mario". "Spyro". And others. It's clear that they were just cutting and pasting from lists they'd compiled from ten minutes of research. There are no games that go by the one word title "Zelda". Similarly, there are no games that go by the one word title "Spyro", unless you drop subtitles on a few games. There was a game, apparently, that went by the one word title "Mario" on the Commodore 64, but the likelihood that anyone taking the survey would've played that one is next to nil. They also list "Final Fantasy", which was the title of exactly one game, which has been ported to many different systems by now.
What really pissed me off was that, halfway through the survey, it blocked me from continuing because I was using FireFox, and apparently FireFox is the spawn of the devil or something, because they'd programmed their survey to only work in Internet Explorer 7. Then it wouldn't let me back in when I tried to re-enter the survey in the proper browser. I was not warned of the requirement before I started the survey.
At first, I wondered if Microsoft has control over some of these surveys. I noticed that, when asked what websites I went to for gaming news, most of the ones listed were general sites, but one of them stood out: Xbox Fanboy*. It sounds like a Microsoft fan site, doesn't it? However, the website has little to do with the Xbox; it appears at first glance to be another general web site for gaming news. The name is misleading, and seems like it would drive away all except those who happen to like everything that Microsoft has done.
On the About Us page, Xbox Fanboy tries to gloss over the fact that it's just an ad site, set up to encourage people to go to their partner website, shopping.com. The way they phrase it, it makes it sound like the web site is fully automated, while pretending to be the home of a fan of the Xbox. It's kind of a weak ploy, in my opinion, a way to try to advertise a web site while spending as little money as possible. Not only did it make me wonder what it was doing on that survey, but it also made me reconsider my first impression. The survey may not have originated from Microsoft, but from shopping.com. If not, then the survey was even more poorly researched than I had first thought.
*I hope it's this website. I'm going by memory, since I can't get back into the survey.
Video of the Week:
This is all you need to know about what the idiots at NBC tried to do.
Currently Playing: Sands of Destruction (DS)
Those of you following my Twitter account probably know what I think of this game so far. After using such science fiction references as Soilent Green in Xenogears, it seems like the writers are using other science fiction references this time around. I can't help but see the same race divide in this game as I do in the Moreau series by S. Andrew Swann. In the Moreau series, however, the humans seem to have the upper hand against the various species of animal people, and in this game, the humans are the ones who are at a disadvantage.
In this game, the animal men are called "ferals", but I can't help think of them as "furries". The words are very similar. However, through the course of the game, you're trying to kill all the furries, among other destructive goals. This game must've been influenced by Something Awful (and I refuse to dignify them with a link to their website).
And you probably already know my thoughts about this as well. I'd previously been looking forward to this game, but I've downgraded my enthusiasm in light of a few things that I didn't like about the recently released demo. I'm getting sick of point and click adventuring. It's faster, yes, but it seems like the lazy way out of designing a world map to run around on. For example: while the world map did kinda suck in Suikoden IV, it's no excuse to remove such a thing entirely from games like Suikoden Tierkreis. Likewise, there is little reason to leave it out of this game. I hope the only reason they left it out is because of lack of space on a UMD. They did, after all, carry forward the anime FMV from the Complete PlayStation version. But: they rewrote the lyrics to the opening FMV, and I don't like the new lyrics very much. I shudder to think about what they might've done to my precious Boat Song...



Recent Comments